Why collecting diversity data is essential, barriers to measurement, how to get started and what to look out for.
Achieving progress in diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) requires ongoing systemic change to address historic inequity and exclusion.
“As important as good intentions are, deep-level change will not be made unless there is a proactive and sustained effort driven by a strategic vision – in this way, DEI is no different to any other workplace imperative,” says Diversity Works New Zealand Head of Research and Development Pete Mercer.
The only sure way organisations will understand whether they are making progress in implementing change is to collect data across a range of different indicators, including both qualitative and quantitative measures, to form a more well-rounded evaluation of their DEI mahi,’ Mercer says.
“Ultimately what gets measured gets done. Collecting pertinent information and tracking your organisation’s progress over time not only provides the evidence base that you need to further your work, it also serves as a form of accountability, whereby the organisation can be more transparent about its progress with its people and any other stakeholders.
“Measuring your work helps you to better understand trends across your organisation, but it also demonstrates your commitment to DEI as an organisation and helps you to stay focused on your journey.”
Given the strategic importance of collecting data, it’s concerning that almost half of workplaces in New Zealand don’t formally measure and evaluate the effectiveness of diversity initiatives, Mercer says.
This finding came from the 2022 New Zealand Workplace Diversity Survey – another 26 per cent of respondents indicated they were not aware of any measuring process in place, with only 28 per cent reporting their organisation formally measure and evaluate initiatives.
Failing to collect data and evaluate it can result in progress stalling or a situation where inclusion initiatives are seen as tokenistic rather than something that requires sustained effort and the achievement of tangible outcomes, Mercer says.
“Your people insights risk being informed by assumptions, rather than accurate information, and there is potential for your leadership team to become out of touch with the lived experience of employees, hampering their ability to support an inclusive working environment.”
In the worst-case scenario, the organisation’s values or what it says it stands for becomes very far removed from the day-to-day reality of staff.
“Without focused measures of success, we also see organisations expending lots of time, money and energy on a wide range of DEI initiatives in an attempt to ‘do the right thing’.
“While this usually doesn’t hurt, and we would never discourage organisations that are investing in DEI work, throwing things at the wall and seeing what sticks is rarely beneficial in the long-term, because it lacks clarity of purpose and often results in fatigue.”
Reluctance to measure
Mercer says there are several reasons organisations may be disinclined to collect data on their diversity mahi.
Sometimes it comes down to a lack of understanding of the need for a strategic approach.
There can also be an unwillingness to distil meaningful experiences into quantifiable metrics or to give the impression of simply “ticking a box”.
“This is an entirely understandable perspective because it’s important that this work is meaningful and authentic. Rather than negating the need for measures of success, however, it highlights that metrics should reflect the real needs and experiences of your people and for there to be a good balance between output and impact measurement. It also calls for a transparent leadership approach that is honest about limitations and shortfalls exposed by the data, while remaining aspirational and optimistic in vision.”
Another barrier for organisations is a lack of data or even the mechanisms needed to acquire the right data. In this case, it’s important for workplaces to start with what they do know, use this information to create initial targets, then set out a plan to expand their data collection and analysis.
Smaller organisations can find it more challenging to collect data due to available resources. The solution is not to try to emulate the approach of larger organisations, but to find different means of collecting data and information and using different kinds of metrics to measure success – ones that don’t rely on large data sets, Mercer says.
“Quite often though, in general organisations don’t measure their DEI work simply because they don’t know where to start.”
Getting started
The first step is for organisations to have a clear sense of what they want to achieve, by developing their vision and rationale for DEI, Mercer says.
This means having conversations with colleagues about what ‘good’ could look like for their organisation.
“Working backwards from there, organisations can translate this wider vision into a coherent strategy, identifying the key objectives that should be met for the vision to become reality, then building in realistic and pragmatic measures of success to define when those objectives have been met.”
Undertaking any data collection has potential pitfalls, Mercer says.
When collecting demographic data, organisations need to take into consideration:
With general metrics or performance measurements remember:
Our Diversity Data resource series has more information on best practices for data collection. You will find it in the Member Resource area of the Diversity Infrastructure resource page.
Download the digital edition of Taura magazine August2023